And that, boys and girls, is how a prequel is done...
**** Oscar Worthy
Rated PG-13 (for violence)
Thursday, December 15, 2016
Wednesday, September 14, 2016
"Ketchup"
Ketchup….it goes with everything and enhances the eating experience,
and can make leftovers taste anew. So here’s my attempt at playing “ketchup”
Maggie’ Plan
Maggie falls for John, a married man. Their elicit
relationship becomes even more complicated when they have a baby and move in
together. After a while, however, Maggie
realizes that perhaps this isn’t the perfect happily ever after she had
imagined and plots to get John back together with his wife, Georgette.
** ½ Rentable
Rated R (for language and sexuality)
Love &
Friendship
In 18th century England, a widowed Lady attempts
to solve her financial dilemmas by marrying off her young daughter to a wealthy
husband. Her schemes are complicated by
her daughters’ lack of interest and a possible blossoming romance with a financially
unworthy suitor.
** ½ Rentable
Rated PG (for thematic elements)
Life Animated
A documentary about how a young autistic boy learns to speak
and communicate with the world around him by repeatedly watching and then regurgitating
dialogue from Disney animated movies.
**** Oscar Worthy
Rated PG (for thematic elements)
The Shallows
A young surfer travels to a secret beach to spend the day on
the waves. While paddling out she is
attacked by a great white shark. She
manages to make it to a small embankment away from the shoreline. Alone and
wounded, she attempts to survive and get ashore.
*** Must See
Rated PG-13 (for violence and language)
Mike & Dave Need
Wedding Dates
Hard-partying brothers Mike and Dave place an online ad to
find the perfect dates for their sister’s Hawaiian wedding.
* ½ Not-a-chance
Rated R (for crude sexual content, language, drug use and graphic
nudity)
Central Intelligence
Calvin, an underwhelmed accountant is surprised to run into
an old high-school classmate named Bob. The once overweight and bullied Bob is
now a CIA agent and looking for help on a case from his long lost friend.
** ½ Rentable
Rated PG-13 (for violence, language, crude humor and brief nudity)
Ghostbusters (2016)
This 30 year old familiar story gets a facelift and a sex
change as we once again follow 3 scientists and one subway attendant as they
battle a slew of ghosts haunting New York City.
** ½ Rentable
Rated PG-13 (for violence and crude humor)
Bad Moms
When life has finally pushed them to their limits, three
overstressed, overworked, and severely underappreciated moms decide to ditch
their conventional ways for a jolt of fun and self-indulgence. However their
new found freedom causes a clash with the local PTA powers that are dedicated
to being “perfect”.
** ½ Rentable
Rated R (for graphic nudity, sexual material, language and drug and
alcohol content)
Pete’s Dragon
After a tragic accident, a young boy finds himself lost and
alone in the forest in the Pacific Northwest. He is found and taken care of by the
unlikeliest of caregivers, a dragon, named Elliot. Years later, he is found by a forest ranger
that takes him in but her attempts are complicated by a man that wants to hunt
down the legendary dragon.
** Rentable
Rated PG (for peril and danger)
Suicide Squad
A team of incarcerated criminals are recruited by the government
for their “anti-hero” skills to complete a dangerous mission in exchange for reduced
sentences.
*** Must See
Rated PG-13 (for disturbing behavior, violence, suggestive content, and
language)
Sausage Party
The inventory at a supermarket dreams of their post-checkout
afterlife. When a few items learn of the
horror that awaits them when humans bring them home they try desperately to
escape their edible fate.
** Rentable
Rated R (for language, drug use and STRONG crude sexual content)
Florence Foster
Jenkins
Heiress Florence Foster Jenkins loves music, it is her life
and while she does everything she can to support the performing arts in 1940’s
New York, she wants to do more. With the
help and encouragement of her husband and a talented musician she arranges to
perform in the one and only Carnegie Hall. There is only one problem…she can’t
sing.
*** ½ MUST SEE!
Rated PG-13 (for suggestive situations)
Monday, March 28, 2016
Batman vs. Superman: Dawn of Justice

Where do I begin....
This was such a let down. Let me first start by framing my thoughts with the fact that I LOVE Superman. I do. I am a devout fan and the fact that Henry Cavill has been so perfectly cast only makes this all the more difficult.
1. This is such a jumbled forced script. I understand that Warner Brothers is trying to play catch up with Disney and the new Marvel storm that they have brought the cinematic world, but that's no reason to rush your script. There was so much forced into this that I had no clue what was going on the first 45 minutes of the movie and to be honest by the time I figured it out, I didn't care.
2. I also understand that Warner Brothers wanted to be first out of the gate and not be the remake. If you don't understand what I mean by that, just wait a few weeks and go see Captain America: Civil War. Same theory, similar characters, no doubt Disney didn't forget the plot.
3. Was there a need to recap all of Batman's story? We all saw the recent remakes Batman Begins, The Dark Knight, and The Dark Knight Rises (not to mention the four before these). We know Batman's origin story and the recap was a total waste of time. On the flip side, was the name Diana Prince ever even mentioned....?
4. Wonder Woman?!?! Don't get me wrong, in the mess that was this movie, she was by far the best part. Having said that, there was no need to introduce her at this junction in the DC tale. She did nothing to further the plot and as mentioned above would have been a much more effective character had she been a CIA sleuth that is eventually identified as, yes you guessed it, Diana Prince. That's it. That is all we needed. No need to bring her into full Wonder Woman costume. Just introduce her as the alter ego that is in the present day... that makes more sense as we haven't been given her origin story yet.
5. Lex Luthor. Although perfectly cast as the despicable villain, Jesse Eisenburg played the role more like the Joker and less like the narcissistic genius that is Lex Luthor. He was creepy and clearly psychotic, on the edge and irrational almost, which isn't what Superman's nemesis is. The arch enemy of Superman is calm and cool and so smart that he is an actual threat to the Man of Steel. I get that Batman was in the mix but no need to resurrect the Joker.
6. Dark. We get it. DC is going dark. Dark Knight, Dark Knight Rises, Dawn of Justice. It's all very dark. Nevertheless, they have gone so dark that they have left out the fun that is a comic book movie. Where is the satire and the willingness to not take yourself so seriously but to accept that this is all based on comic books. Men in shiny tights with cool toys. It's suppose to be fun. This was just a black hole.
7. I will stop here. My hands are getting tired and my dismay is shadowing my ability to type. But let me make this last point. Superman, Batman and Wonder Woman are by far the three most popular and well known comic book superheroes... on the planet. There is no reason that these movies shouldn't be the very best and yet they (I am including Man of Steel in this) are being poorly represented and coming in a distant fifth or sixth to Marvel characters that I had never even heard of until recent years.
Pitiful.
The fight scenes go on way to long and the storyline is like a firework that was set off by accident.
* 1/2 - For devout fans it's rentable
Rated PG-13 (for excess violence)
Official Site: http://batmanvsuperman.dccomics.com/
Zootopia
A spunky rabbit is determined to make it as a police officer in the big city.
This was unexpectedly fun and cute. While the story is simple enough most of the comedy is satirical and will be more for the grown ups in the audience than the children.
Extremely well done and fun for all, however those under 4 might get restless with the length.
*** 1/2 - Must See
Rated PG (for dramatic elements and violence)
Official Site: http://movies.disney.com/zootopia
This was unexpectedly fun and cute. While the story is simple enough most of the comedy is satirical and will be more for the grown ups in the audience than the children.
Extremely well done and fun for all, however those under 4 might get restless with the length.
*** 1/2 - Must See
Rated PG (for dramatic elements and violence)
Official Site: http://movies.disney.com/zootopia
Wednesday, December 23, 2015
Star Wars: The Force Awakens
It's everything that the prequels were not!
**** Must See - So much fun!
Rated PG-13 (for violence)
Official Site: http://www.starwars.com/the-force-awakens/
Monday, June 22, 2015
Inside Out
Meet the emotions inside 11 year old, Riley's head that make up who she is; Joy, Anger, Fear, Disgust and Sadness. When her family moves from the comforts of Milwaukee to a new home in San Francisco, Riley's world, and her emotions are turned upside down.
This is Pixar at its best; amazingly original, clever and full of heart. I'm not ashamed to say it squeezed a tear or two out of me. The animation is beautiful, with very fun Tex Avery style animation when we go inside the world of Riley's brain. It also made me want to never move at any point in my children's lives. In the end it communicates a wonderful message in a very funny, inventive way.
**** out of 4
Official Site: http://movies.disney.com/inside-out/
This is Pixar at its best; amazingly original, clever and full of heart. I'm not ashamed to say it squeezed a tear or two out of me. The animation is beautiful, with very fun Tex Avery style animation when we go inside the world of Riley's brain. It also made me want to never move at any point in my children's lives. In the end it communicates a wonderful message in a very funny, inventive way.
**** out of 4
Official Site: http://movies.disney.com/inside-out/
Jurassic World
The park is open, and has been successfully entertaining guests with genetically engineered dinosaurs for the past 22 years. But corporate wants more; more money, more teeth. Genetics have advanced and more comes in the form of a new genetically modified hybrid dinosaur, that is bigger, faster, stronger and has more teeth...what could possibly go wrong?
The original Jurassic Park is my favorite film of all time. I credit it as my main inspiration for becoming an animator. The subsequent sequels are two of my most despised movies of all time. So, I approached Jurassic World with ridiculous levels of excitement and a healthy dose of trepidation.
So, after viewing Jurassic World, the first thought that comes to mind is fun. The original it is not, but this is a very entertaining movie. It doesn't quite capture the awe and wonder that the original did, but it couldn't, and it plays on that in a fun way that makes sense; we've been wowed, now give us more. There's a certain level of camp and cheese that works well, for the most part. The action and pacing is quick and well constructed. The climax is quite epic (I may have fist pumped/cheered). I actually saw this twice on opening weekend and both showings inspired a loud round of applause when the credits rolled, pretty fun, I haven't seen that in quite some time. I have my complaints about some of the dinosaurs that only a dinosaur nerd like myself would care about (where are the feathers on T-Rex and the raptors!?), but I'll spare you my ramblings, and actually most of my complaints are explained away with a simple line from Dr. Wu while he's arguing with the park owner. See, I've already started to ramble. Fine summer fun and a worthy sequel to Jurassic Park.
*** out of 4: Must See
Official Site (very fun site, made as if it's the site for a real park): http://www.jurassicworld.com/
The original Jurassic Park is my favorite film of all time. I credit it as my main inspiration for becoming an animator. The subsequent sequels are two of my most despised movies of all time. So, I approached Jurassic World with ridiculous levels of excitement and a healthy dose of trepidation.
So, after viewing Jurassic World, the first thought that comes to mind is fun. The original it is not, but this is a very entertaining movie. It doesn't quite capture the awe and wonder that the original did, but it couldn't, and it plays on that in a fun way that makes sense; we've been wowed, now give us more. There's a certain level of camp and cheese that works well, for the most part. The action and pacing is quick and well constructed. The climax is quite epic (I may have fist pumped/cheered). I actually saw this twice on opening weekend and both showings inspired a loud round of applause when the credits rolled, pretty fun, I haven't seen that in quite some time. I have my complaints about some of the dinosaurs that only a dinosaur nerd like myself would care about (where are the feathers on T-Rex and the raptors!?), but I'll spare you my ramblings, and actually most of my complaints are explained away with a simple line from Dr. Wu while he's arguing with the park owner. See, I've already started to ramble. Fine summer fun and a worthy sequel to Jurassic Park.
*** out of 4: Must See
Official Site (very fun site, made as if it's the site for a real park): http://www.jurassicworld.com/
Inside Out
A little girls emotions are at the helm of her brain and take pride in running a tight and happy ship. When her family moves from Minnesota to San Francisco - Joy and Sadness are displaced leaving, fear, anger and disgust to run the show.
This is a very cute, very creative take on the human psyche. The characters are all very endearing and sweet. The story is charming and fun and at 94 minutes is perfectly timed. There is the slight oddity that Riley's emotions are both male and female while everyone else seems to have single gender - story glitch or current social climate? You be the judge.
Children will find this new and exciting while adults will find it nostalgic and poignant.
Well done Pixar.
***1/2 Must See
Rate PG (not sure why it's not G - scary clown maybe?)
Official Site: http://movies.disney.com/inside-out/
This is a very cute, very creative take on the human psyche. The characters are all very endearing and sweet. The story is charming and fun and at 94 minutes is perfectly timed. There is the slight oddity that Riley's emotions are both male and female while everyone else seems to have single gender - story glitch or current social climate? You be the judge.
Children will find this new and exciting while adults will find it nostalgic and poignant.
Well done Pixar.
***1/2 Must See
Rate PG (not sure why it's not G - scary clown maybe?)
Official Site: http://movies.disney.com/inside-out/
Jurassic World
Does this sound familiar? It should, as it is essentially a remake of the first Jurassic Park. Two children visit a relative that is in charge of the Dinosaur theme park. Due to the greed and inept people at InGen, the park suffers a break down and the dinosaurs wreak havoc on the park visitors. You get the gist; it's a bit more evolved but fundamentally the same. Just bigger, scarier, and more teeth.
Overall it is the best of all the sequels even if it is a shiny remake. It pays just enough homage to the original film that you can almost overlook that there are actual scene by scene reproductions - again just slightly more technically enhanced.
For Jurassic Junkies it's a total must see and even for the casual movie goer - it's lots of summer fun.
***Must See
Rated PG-13 (for language and violence)
Official Site: http://www.jurassicworld.com/
Wednesday, December 31, 2014
The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies
It’s part three.
OK kids, you know that I would rather walk on my lips than to criticize anybody… nevertheless let me take a moment to re-assess our situation here with the Hobbit.
The prequel to The Lord of the Ring trilogy....
To recap, the book The Fellowship of the Ring is 398 pages long. The book The Two Towers is 327 pages and the book Return of the King is 412 pages long. Each of these books were neatly adapted into award winning films of some length --178 minutes, 179 minutes, and 201 minutes respectively.
Once again, with this information, could someone please elucidate as to why the book The Hobbit, a book that is only 310 pages long was adapted into three, yes three cinematic episodes 169 minutes, 161 minutes, and finally a 144 minute picture? It makes no sense! Let me, if I may, point out the following; if I am not mistaken The Hobbit is a children’s’ book. A predecessor to the epic stories of The Lord of the Ring it may be, but it was first and foremost a CHILDRENS book. Now in my mind I would think that this is a great opportunity to create a film that is
A) Scaled back, literally and figuratively told from the perspective of a Hobbit, perhaps making it not so extravagantly warlike and grisly.
B) Is childlike, more whimsical while still full of intricate details that pay homage to the stories that will follow, yet still shrewd enough perhaps only to be appreciated by the truly devout fans, thereby letting the story and film stand on its own.
And
C) Made once (not three times) and under two hours!
This final chapter to a seemingly never ending story was in my mind a huge let down. It picks up right where we last left off and like the subtitle informs us, it is a battle of the five armies. That’s pretty much it. That's right ***spoiler alert*** there is an ostentatious battle of five armies. No plot points mind you – just a giant mêlée that plays out like a soap operatic epilogue. Although the special effects are spectacular the movie itself presents the audience with about 3 minutes of new information divided up by 141 minutes of fighting and backdrops.
For those that are earnest fans of the marathon stories it is a must see, but for those that are barely enthusiasts. Ehhh.
** Rentable
Rated PG-13 (for violence and gore)
Official Site: http://www.thehobbit.com/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



















